Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stars Go Dim (EP)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Stars Go Dim.  MBisanz  talk 16:54, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Stars Go Dim (EP)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No significant coverage of this EP. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:25, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to Stars Go Dim. The EP doesn't merit an article. --Michig (talk) 21:18, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:08, 14 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Stars Go Dim - I would perform the redirect myself as I think this is the best option but I'll allow additional consensus. Now, as for my vote, Google News archives found three results and a different search provided another here. It appears the EP never received much attention after the release and was not used for any commercial purposes. SwisterTwister   talk  00:26, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per ST. Honestly, it isn't a highly likely search term, but redirects are cheap.  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;  Join WER 02:46, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep or redirect to Stars Go Dim - This, along with their 2011 EP should be redirected to the band discography page or kept. That being said, do we really want the track listings for all three albums in the main Stars Go Dim article?  Per WP:NALBUMS, "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting".--Jax 0677 (talk) 09:50, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * If the concern is clutter rather than article size (the band article is pretty small at the moment), the tracklistings could always be put in collapsible tables. In this case, I don't think that including the track lists in the band article would be a real problem. --Michig (talk) 10:09, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Stars Go Dim. Not notable and plenty of space in the article for any useful info with or without the track list. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 06:08, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.