Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stars and Bucks Cafe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Starbucks. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:05, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Stars and Bucks Cafe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This cafe has been briefly mentioned in a couple of newspaper articles in 2010, which doesn't amount to "significant coverage", thus failing notability. Gabi S. (talk) 09:27, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 16:15, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Coverage is quite sparse. Non-notable. -- Gabi S. (talk) 19:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The coverage by the U.S. newspaper is actually pretty significant, but there isn't really enough coverage besides that. Ibadibam (talk) 21:52, 9 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge into "Parodies and infringements" section of Starbucks. Coverage is significant, but not plentiful enough to warrant a separate article. Ibadibam (talk) 21:52, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 18:52, 18 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge per Ibadibam. Note the coverage of fake Apple Stores at Apple Store. Yeah, a few newspapers have noted that there's a spoof Starbucks. Not a big deal, not to the point where a standalone article is warranted. --BDD (talk) 23:37, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.