Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stars and thier life cycles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:10, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Stars and thier life cycles
Star is sufficient imo... plus i'm a bit concerned about this article's title... copyvio? Jackk 01:55, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Most of this info is already in Stellar evolution. And "thier?" RabidMonkeysEatGrass 02:10, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another well-meaning user learns a lesson. Daniel Case 02:02, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 15:27, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete homework assignment; content better covered elsewhere. &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 17:25, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. "Thier" is giving me the shakes. 23skidoo 18:17, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Didn't something on astronomy recently get transferred to Wikibooks? This article has more detail and could be transferred as a separate book and/or merged. Fg2 07:43, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.