Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Start Desenhos Animados


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:38, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Start Desenhos Animados

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Written by a COI/SPA, there are no sources to support notability and corpdepth. MT Train Talk 12:35, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 12:35, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 12:35, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 12:35, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 06:09, 10 March 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. First of all, the current name for this company is Start Anima or "StartAnima" according to its own website so searches for sources are likely to be more productive under that name. Accoding to the company website they have been winning national and international awards since 1972.  That's a long time to have been around.  At least two of their films have Wikipedia articles.  Their latest feature film (Lino, the Film or Lino 3D) is getting a lot of attention both in Portuguese (Revide, Estadão) and English (Variety[Screen Daily).  The translation of the Estadão article says "by raising more than $4 million in box office, Lino is the biggest animation in the history of Brazilian cinema".  I think that must count as notable. [[User:Spinningspark|Spinning]]Spark 01:43, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes  19:30, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. In addition, this is a highly promotional article for which no effort has been taken to add any sources at all. We should expect better from our articles espcecially in areas prone to COI and promotion. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:57, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - lacks significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 00:32, 25 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.