Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Startups in Goa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  02:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Startups in Goa

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article covers a combination of different topics, none of which warrant their own article. The article reads like a news report and isn't properly cited. There's a quotation about "reliable internet providers", but the source itself has nothing to do with internet providers or startups. HyperAccelerated (talk) 02:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Economics, Technology,  and Goa.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Citations taken are from credible sources. This is an important issue, more so from the perspective of an Indian Wikipedia reader, and if there are any shortcomings, I feel the page could be improved, rather than censor the same. Fredericknoronha (talk) 03:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting. It would be helpful to get an assessment on content added to the article since its nomination. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  06:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: Noting that this is the article creator, so words like "important" are from an obviously slanted perspective. An AfD isn't censorship. You've had more than five and a half years to improve this article. HyperAccelerated (talk) 03:28, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree with Fredrick. Lets improve the page with the citations and sources instead of deleting it. Jervisap (talk) 05:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per nom. The newly added cites do not add into the cause of keep significantly. Also Times of India is not reliable per WP:TOI and the other added sources got a very promotional tone. From 'an Indian Wikipedia reader's view', the page is a collection of random topics and hence, do not warrant a standalone article currently. Another note to the closer: Jervisap sounds WP:MEAT for Fredrick after having a look at their contributions and userpage. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. I do not see evidence that this topic (if it is even well-defined enough to be called a "topic," rather than an amalgam of "startups" and "Goa") meets the GNG.  Arbitrarily0   ( talk ) 02:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.