Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starwolf (Edmond Hamilton)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:39, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Starwolf (Edmond Hamilton)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:BOOK. --Legis (talk - contribs) 04:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'd love to be able to keep this up on the mainspace but I just can't find anything to show that this is notable. Just to note, if this is deleted then we need to change the info about this on the Starwolf disambiguation page. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Undecided. It did spawn Star Wolf (TV series) and two feature films. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Changing vote to undecided/weak keep. That it spawned that many versions of the series does show that it passes WP:NBOOK, although the article is in dire need of sources.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 11:35, 15 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)




 * Keep or merge into Edmond Hamilton as a section for a while, then bring it back as a book trilogy. Article or section, it needs considerable expansion; it's been too long since I've read it for me to help.  htom (talk) 17:47, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 13:49, 29 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.