Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/State Class Battleship BB


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. X clamation point  06:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

State Class Battleship BB

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Disputed prod, an article that references some online web fiction. Seems to fail notability guidelines, as currently being discussed here, as well as therefore lacking reliable sources. A similar article by the author, State Class Battleship, has also been prodded. Benea (talk) 22:21, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following related page after the prod was disputed, for much the same reason:
 * Benea (talk) 22:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - As original PRODer. § FreeRangeFrog 22:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable original fiction. --L. Pistachio (talk) 23:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced, non-notable personal fiction. Also delete State Class Battleship Yamato which is another duplicate article. Edward321 (talk) 06:21, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Considering the several duplicate versions of the article that have been created, I recommend Salt as well. Edward321 (talk) 01:45, 28 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as advertising 76.66.193.90 (talk) 06:58, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment don't forget the article State Class Battleship Yamato 76.66.193.90 (talk) 07:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unpublished fiction. Also State class battleship. . . Rcawsey (talk) 08:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment When I first saw these articles appear, I just assumed they were something in the US Navy.... The work they seem to be related to is not only online, it's published. Unfortunately, it's published through lulu which means self-published. That casts quite a lot of doubt on its notability. I wish the author luck in getting proper publication if the book's up to it. Peridon (talk) 00:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.