Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/State of Sabotage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. The prod-cleaning admin can also contest the deletion, so the procedural argument is moot, yet the rest of the comments stand. Tito xd (?!?) 20:07, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

State of Sabotage
It was on Prod that ended today. There are quite a lot of google hits at least for the sculpture in Australia. I think it should go through Afd. Voting Neutral for now abakharev 03:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete and close, no need for AfD if prod was uncontested for five days. Incoherent anyway. SM247 04:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and close, as if the prod was uncontested for five days, the article should have been deleted. Also, the sculpture is notable, but its notability doesn't transfer to the article's subject. --Coredesat talk 04:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge any verifiable info to H. R. Giger -- N  scheffey (T/C) 08:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. --&#160;Omniplex 09:21, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.