Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/State of the Art PC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete Jtkiefer T  01:18, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

State of the Art PC
Inescapably (admitted) POV article about the "Wikipedia interpretation" of the best possible computer. (ESkog)(Talk) 00:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Someone's Christmas wish-list. Owen&times; &#9742;  00:26, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No content of use to anyone but the article's originators.  Only one Wiki page links to it and it links to no others.--R6MaY89 00:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom Tom Harrison (talk) 03:10, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * stay the entry is not finished in 5 minutes, makes it better Mr.Do! 03:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator and others. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 03:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete is silly, we have enough stuff to own State of the Art categorie, for CPUs, medical technology, engines and many other things, PC is only the first entry here. Every range of products has on evolutionary point somewhere. Mr.Do! 04:10, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and per OwenX. &mdash;Brim 05:19, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * "The State of the Art PC is a Wikipedia view [...]" &mdash; Wikipedia has no views.  This article is both non-neutral and original research. Delete. Uncle G 06:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * this was former, all to grumble so much, however, why improve nothing? there is certainly still a better memory somewhere! Mr.Do! 06:41, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I may have mis-read it, but think that Mr.Do! is pointing out that in response xe changed that to "The State of the Art PC is a Wikipedia NPOV [...]". Changing the sentence into something that now doesn't actually make any sense at all doesn't alter the fundamental problems with this article. I've no idea what the final sentence of the above means.  Please clarify. Uncle G 09:01, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * State of the Art is a slogan of many companies. But in the reality purely subjectively. Alone the Wikipediauser can evaluate which that is! Everyone knows something, and the sum of all parts is a new realization what the State of the Art is, the truth is not outside by Dell, Apple, IBM or somewhere otherwise as enzyklopical fact! Mr.Do! 14:23, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * We don't create new realizations here; nor do we do truths that do not exist outside of Wikipedia. Uncle G 17:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This page is not only pointless, but the person who wrote it obviously could not have come to a consensus with the rest of the Wikipedia editors.  Furthermore, this doesn't belong in an encyclopedia.  To say that something is state of the art as of 2005 might be okay in an article about a specific technology, but to make an article about a hypothetical computer is just pointless.  --Thephotoman 06:50, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The actually State of the specific technology, example the Parts in the HydrogenCar is never not hypothetical pointless in the state of the art, then this is always a today's estimate out the quality sales. Mr.Do! 14:47, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, but make a page for Recommended hardware requirements if we don't already have one. Firebug 07:33, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom & others. Billbrock 11:12, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as unencyclopedic, per Uncle G, Thephotoman, and others. –Sommers (Talk) 11:15, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Sommers. IanManka 15:09, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Gimme! r3m0t talk 16:59, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Firebug Jcuk 19:49, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I think someone can figure this out if we just link to State of the art, we don't need a seperate page for PC's. VegaDark 22:17, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, change page to a redirect to State of the art.--Aleron235 23:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.