Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statehouse News Online


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:15, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Statehouse News Online

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficient coverage by independent reliable sources. I could only find one such source (Pew) and the coverage there is nowhere near enough to create an encyclopedic article. Two more sources (In These Times, Wisconsin Citizens Media Cooperative.) are independent but appear unreliable. On top of that the subject's website appears to be defunct. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:38, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity, for which this is a project. If this were prodded, I would have done it myself. Bearian (talk) 17:34, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Agree, my !vote changed to Redirect. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 03:20, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:24, 30 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect as suggested by Bearian, as subject is a defunct publication of a notable organization.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.