Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staten-Island-Underground-Music-List


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If anyone wishes to have it userfied, just leave a note on my talk page. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:11, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Staten-Island-Underground-Music-List

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Almost completely unreferenced and unverifiable list of mostly non-notable bands. According to the page text, it was compiled from a series of message board postings, so it will be virtually impossible to locate reliable sources for most if not all of these entries. R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment isn't a notable "underground" music list an oxymoron? Drawn Some (talk) 21:41, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:48, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:48, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy - I'd say CSD but it looks like a lot of work from mostly new users. Could be the basis of some valuable articles if references can be added. -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  21:56, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Wikify - Agreed with Hexa. If it survives this AfD, I'm willing to take a hack at making it look like an encyclopedia article. If it's still full of redlinks in a month, I'll nominate it for deletion myself. Nanowolf (talk) 07:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment That said, "Staten underground bands" seems a bit specific, and this specificity could be the cause of the notability issues. Anyone with more experience regarding WP:Lists willing to chime in? Nanowolf (talk) 07:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment After further thinking, I'm tempted to call this listcruft. But two editors is hardly enough for consensus... Nanowolf (talk) 09:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.