Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staten Island Economic Development Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Staten Island Economic Development Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

One reference to their own website. Seems to have a lot of mentions in articles, but none go into detail. Don't know what their relation is with New York City Economic Development Corporation, if any. Sungodtemple (talk &#8226; contribs) 02:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  02:41, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, United States of America,  and New York. Sungodtemple (talk &#8226; contribs) 02:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, but the article needs some serious work, the group oversees some multi-million dollars projects that are somewhat important, and they have enough news coverage, but the author just chose not to include that. Scu ba (talk) 18:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I found nom convincing and this comment not convincing. बिनोद थारू (talk) 23:36, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Could you elaborate on "nom convincing" and what part about my statement was not convincing? Scu ba (talk) 04:55, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - I note that has been indef blocked for disruptive editing. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:39, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Lots of local coverage at silive.com, and some regional/national coverage of their projects (which I think is the crux of their notability -- the Skyway, tram, and other big infrastructural/redevelopment projects seem to get attention). It's not a slam dunk, though, and the water is muddied with a lot of local promotional events ("nominate an important local businessperson!" type stuff), but there's likely enough to squeak by GNG. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 16:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Doesn't seem to be much in depth coverage about the organization itself and as such the subject fails WP:NCORP. Let&#39;srun (talk) 14:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Scu ba has done some good work trying to rescue the article. I concur that the silive.com has some decent sources, was the most detailed I saw after a quick look. Tough to say what would be a second source independent silive though, maybe, hard to say if it is a reliable source as it's very opinionated but it's the most significant coverage I could find. Darcyisvery cute  (talk) 04:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Seems to have sufficient sources, though there is room for improvement. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:43, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.