Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Static Music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:54, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Static Music

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per source searches, does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. North America1000 07:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - non-notable as a record label. No indication label has had any impact on musical culture, musical genres, or the development of notable artists.   78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 15:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Bobherry  Talk   Edits  13:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.