Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stationary policy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Ξxtreme Unction |yakkity yak 14:04, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Stationary policy
One-line, trivial, self-evident sub-stub dictionary definition; no potential for encyclopedic expansion; delete. MCB 22:25, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, not self evident, I thought it was about management of office supplies. Can be expanded to explain why policies are stationary and when they are desireable. Kappa 06:14, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * that would be stationery └UkPaolo/TALK┐ 08:35, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * delete seems like no more potential than a dictdef (which can be transwikied to Wiktionary). Delete until such time an encyclopedic entry is written. └UkPaolo/TALK┐ 08:35, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki and then delete per UkPaolo. Caerwine Caerwhine 15:17, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * delete as per nom. DES (talk) 01:09, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki and delete per UKPaolo. Stifle 23:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.