Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statue of Winston Churchill, Mishkenot Sha’ananim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus here is that the topic meets notability guidelines. North America1000 21:14, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Statue of Winston Churchill, Mishkenot Sha’ananim

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Churchill is notable but that does not mean every bust or statue made in his image is. The article's history section mostly discusses Nemon and his relationship to Churchill. Only two references are provided that actually discuss this bust, and they are newspaper reports of its unveiling and do not represent significant coverage. Polyamorph (talk) 16:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:23, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:23, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * keep quite a bit of coverage, actually. Added some materai/sources to the page.  When individual statues of famous people get coverage in WP:RS, it is hard to see the argument for deleting an article.  Note that we have a lot of Category:Sculptures of people. E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:00, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Polyamorph (talk) 08:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep as additional references and content sourced to multiple significant reliable sources coverage have been added to the article so there is no valid reason for deletion Atlantic306 (talk) 21:40, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The added sources are again just more of the same press-release re: unveiling the statue. This does not represent significant coverage or long-lasting notability. Polyamorph (talk) 08:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Signed articles are not press releases. When an article is signed, it means that the newspaper assigned a journalist and reported facts. If you read the articles that come up in searches for the year this stature was erected, you will see that these are reported article covering different aspects of the story.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:33, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep per E.M.Gregory. Mosaicberry (talk) 12:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.