Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Status Quo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. AfD is not for cleanup. If you see a problem with the article, please go ahead and fix it. Be Bold!; the community will be happy to help you out in your editing. NW ( Talk ) 20:32, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Status Quo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Very poorly worded, unencycolpedic by any standards and no attempt has been made to rectify issues. Recommendation made that article is started again Dingdong12 (talk) 20:17, 17 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keepp - AfD is not the place for article cleanup. The subject is in no way poorly sourced.  You don't like the article? Fix it.—  Dæ dαlus Contribs  20:20, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Secondly, there is no way that the article is unencylopedic. So far, this appears to be a purely disruptive afd by somebodies' sock.  The account has no contributions outside of this afd as of this post.—  Dæ dαlus Contribs  20:22, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.