Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Status of freedoms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 02:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Status of freedoms

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Original research galore. Emily Jensen (talk) 04:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|15px]] Delete — No sources, no real content, violation of WP:NOT. We ought to have a WP:CSD for this... ℳøℕø 04:27, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No references or sources whatsoever. Does the author decide for themselves whether a country as a freedom or not? J I P  | Talk 05:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - while it is a good faith effort by a new editor, to make what could be a useful list, this appears to be original research. Bearian (talk) 20:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as the creation entirely novel list topics without a verifiable definition contravenes the prohibition on original research as illustrated by WP:MADEUP. As far as I can see, this list, or anything like it, has not be been published anywhere except within Wikipedia, so there is no evidence that it is verifiable, let alone notable. To demonstrate that this topic was not created based on editor's own idea, a verifiable definition is needed to provide external validation that this list complies with content policy. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 12:44, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.