Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staunton-Lambert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy-delete. Page-blanked by the original author and only editor. I'm taking that as evidence that speedy case G7 applies. Rossami &#91;&#91;User talk:Rossami&#124;(talk)]] 01:56, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Staunton-Lambert
Wikipedia articles are not genealogical entries, especially not when the author of a page is linked from it. I was tempted to speedy as an A7, but it's too much of a stretch. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 03:37, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Get thee to Wikitree! The article is a simple genealogy of a Wikipedia user.  Delete. Uncle G 04:43, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above and the fact that none of those people are claimed to be notable (but since it's a group of people, failing the current nn-bio criteria I think?). Anyway I see no reason to keep this article.  --W.marsh 04:44, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable family tree. TheMadBaron 06:38, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. WIkipedia is not a family tree. Already at Wikitree. - Mgm|(talk) 15:00, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Nn Ejrrjs | What? 23:32, 13 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.