Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stavanger Station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was withdrawn by nominator. John254 22:39, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Stavanger Station

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is entirely unreferenced. Per Attribution, "If an article topic has no reliable sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." John254 13:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep 100 year old rail station? Sounds like a specialized topic, but one that could be verified. Mr. Berry 16:39, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Uh it's if no reliable sources can exist that we delete an article. We don't delete just because none are cited at the moment. --W.marsh 19:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Nominating an article for deletion 22 minutes after creation is ridiculous; looking at the creator's edit history, s/he's clearly adding a list of Scandanavian stations as stubs, then expanding them. Should never have been nominated since 30 seconds looking at a rail timetable proves the place exists. -  Irides centi   (talk to me!)  20:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. There's a world of difference between no sources existing, and no sources cited. Mackensen (talk) 21:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Serves Norway's 4th largest city, over 100 year old station and terminus for several lines. And per W.marsh, the nom seems to be confusing a topic with nonexistence of sources with one that has sources but not currently listed in an article about it. 22 minutes is not adaquate amount of time for editors to gradually improve an article and add external sources on a topic. --Oakshade 22:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.