Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StayC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow keep. Consensus is that the StayC article meets WP:BAND. (non-admin closure) gidonb (talk) 00:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

StayC

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article has an interesting log history, first tagged for copyvio, then for CSD A7 and G12, was moved to the draft space by Abdotorg for failing the GNG on November 18, then apparently recreated November 30 with attempt to fix the problems identified previously. In order to sort this, and in light of the constant back and forth with CSD and allegations of copyright infringement, I'm listing it here for community consideration. TomStar81 (Talk) 19:02, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. Although the article may have had some issues in the past regarding notability, those have long since been improved upon, as is logical for a group that is 1 month post-debut rather than 1 week post-debut. The group has charted within the top 10 of a major music market, which meets the notability requirements for WP:BAND. Copyright infringement (although I'm not aware of any on this page) on its own is not a reason for deleting an article, but I'd be happy to edit out any issues that you see in the article's current state. Lukestepford (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Album and single have charted in the US and KO, although not very high. Oaktree b (talk) 20:51, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep has enough sources and meets musician notability guidelines by having charted in top 100 of a country chart.Peter303x (talk) 22:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Substantial sources, good enough music chartings domestically (GAON) or internationally (Billboard). In addition, the said "copyright infringement" site is like Namu Wiki, a site that shouldn't be used as reference when drafting a page in Wikipedia. Speedthief1 (talk) 02:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The group's debut has charted on Billboard or on the Gaon Charts, which makes them pretty well-off and notable enough to host their own article, and they are on the same tier as the other K-pop idol groups with their own pages that debuted this 2020. I don't really see why their page should be taken down over copyright infringement issues when it still can be improved upon as more credible information becomes available. Corpomosis (talk) 10:06, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as has charted, their album reaching no. 6 on the Korean National chart and together with reliable sources coverage such as the South China Morning Post they pass WP:NMUSIC so that deletion is unnecessary in my view. Also have just ran a copyvio check with the earwig tool and its come up clean. Atlantic306 (talk) 00:46, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets #2 of WP:BAND.  Onel 5969  TT me 23:50, 14 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.