Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stay Close


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep/merge. (ESkog)(Talk) 05:14, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Stay Close
Does not really assert notability. Delete. (I would have speedy deleted it if I were completely sure that it's not notable.) --Nlu (talk) 05:05, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Just because a page has little content does not mean it should be deleted.  After assessing its website, I find StayClose to be a relevant organization.  Its Wikipedia page needs added content, not to be deleted.  --  Wikipedical 05:13, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays, the notable organization that is behind the campaign. I don't see any reason for the campaign to have its own article, esp. when the PFLAG article is little more than a stub.  Dbtfz (talk - contribs) 06:00, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm amazed the PFLAG article is so brief. Hrm. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 10:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable. Bobby1011 15:15, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to PFLAG. Seems more of a campaign than a separate organization. Turnstep 14:36, 16 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.