Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stay Stay Stay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash;  Yash [talk] 09:47, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Stay Stay Stay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Should be deleted, with a redirection back to the parent album Red. Per WP:NSONGS, whilst charting does make a song a notable, notability aside there should be extensive coverage of the song as a primary subject. In this case there isnt, and chart positions could easily be added back to the album. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:20, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep This passes NSONGS No. 2 criterion three-times.HotHat (talk) 22:29, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:23, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to the album. --Michig (talk) 07:21, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. There seems to be enough critical attention for this song to justify an article.--Arxiloxos (talk) 07:51, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. The song doesn't fail WP:NSONGS, it has charted on two main charts, plus a component chart. It is relatively small, but it can be expanded and improved. - Saulo  Talk to Me 02:49, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.