Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steel dragon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Dragon (Dungeons & Dragons). Mark Arsten (talk) 18:10, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Steel dragon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This fictional species does not establish notability independent of Dungeons & Dragons through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 23:07, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


 * merge and crop to Dragon (Dungeons & Dragons) under World of Greyhawk.Web Warlock (talk) 12:28, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge into Dragon (Dungeons & Dragons). BOZ (talk) 14:07, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge into Dragon (Dungeons & Dragons). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:48, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * transwiki to some fanboy site that would love this trivia. as for Wikipedia, this article fails WP:GNG as the only sources are primary, (either the creator of D&D TSR or the officially licensed producer of D&D content Piazo) delete or merge if there is appropriate content and an appropriate target. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  21:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete total lack of sources that would establish any real world context to the subject. Merging this article will not fix this fundamental problem and just creates larger list articles that are still unencyclopdic.  Ridernyc (talk) 03:06, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.