Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefán Arason


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 01:20, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Stefán Arason

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod, main claim to notability seems to be a not very notable prize, Europäischer Komponistenpreis. Falls below the notability threshold in my opinion. Stefán 00:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced, NN --RaiderAspect 04:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - A lack of Google hits for the prize does not quite confirm its non-notability. I don't speak Icelandic, but the "press" section of his website points to a few blurbs about him in print media. I think the subject does meet WP:V; if you perform a Google search, you'll see a number of reliable sources featuring him (he actually has 1,350 hits, which isn't bad for a new classical composer). -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 06:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 19:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 20:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not enough sources. --Akhilleus (talk) 22:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I prodded this a while ago and it still seems to me that the article does not establish notability. Haukur 23:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not enough sources to establish notability. Ford MF 23:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 00:18, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Most search engine results are blogs or forums, it seems. The rest are of the composer and probably his record label, hence there are not enough reliable sources.--Kylohk 14:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.