Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan Grun (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 00:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Stefan Grun
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability appears to be his involvement in a collision in an AFL match. This fact could be included in 2004 AFL season. Plastikspork (talk) 22:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - Notability is simply that he is a field umpire in the Australian Football League. Jevansen (talk) 23:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - An umpire that has officiated at the top level of the sport satisfies me in relation to notability. Camw (talk) 23:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, nominator has failed to address the issues which led to the article being kept last time in his/her nomination. Daniel (talk) 23:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.
 * Speedy, Strong, Snow Keep - nominator has not raised any issues which are different to those that led to the article being kept last time.. The-Pope (talk) 03:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: I have no problem retracting my nomination and keeping this page, but I would request that everyone who feels so strongly about the page please "watch this page" for vandalism. Check the edit history. Vandalism that had persisted for months. I find this shocking considering how many people spoke up for it the first time it was nominated, but yet no one cares enough about it to watch it for vandalism. Plastikspork (talk) 20:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - Notability asserted at a base level - that is that he is an umpire in the AFL. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  16:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.