Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan Panaretov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  20:34, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Stefan Panaretov

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Verification search came up empty. Mr. Guye (talk) 10:18, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 31 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep&mdash;Wikidata (bless them) gives a pointer to the Bulgarian wiki article, which has a couple of cites. Translating the page yielded the alternate spelling "Stefan Panaretoff", with google books providing eight hits.  Ah, but it looks like all that work was unnecessary.  The spelling in the article turns up plenty of cites, including   Lesser Cartographies (talk) 02:39, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 04:34, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 16:34, 14 September 2014 (UTC)




 * Keep per Lesser Cartographies's sources; the Pundeff article is quite extensive and can be found through the WayBack Machine here: . Additionally, I also found an article about Panaretoff in the New York Times and I believe this satisfies WP:GNG. Altamel (talk) 23:51, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Ambassadors of a country to the United States or any other major country are inherently notable. Especially the first such. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:37, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. According to WP:POLITICIAN, ambassadors are explicitly not counted as an international-level office that would be inherently notable; they have to pass WP:GNG on their individual merits rather than ex officio. But I believe the scholarly journal article already cited as a source, and a few mentions of him that I could find in Google books, go a long way towards GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.