Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan Siegel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SOFTDELETE j⚛e deckertalk 16:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Stefan Siegel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails the notability criteria for biographies and the general notability guideline. The current sources are a broken link and two passing mentions. Google turns up interviews, passing mentions in relation to Not Just a Label, social media, and false positives. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 00:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:54, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:37, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:37, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:37, 8 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Leaning delete/Comment - Actually, if the interviews are used as the basis for an article with plenty of editorial commentary, then they should be valid sources. While Siegel does give good answers (as here), these are more suitable as sources for an article on Not Just a Label, which does seem like it would pass notability requirements. If this were an article about the company, then it would probably pass muster, but I am not seeing much to show that the founder passes the criteria for an article solely on him. On the other hand, NJAL is clearly drawing a lot of attention, respect and is the reason people are interviewing Siegel, so this article should really have been a brief biographical section on a company page. Mabalu (talk) 02:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:04, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 03:03, 23 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.