Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefanini IT Solutions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:04, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Stefanini IT Solutions

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article is low on notability and not having any citations or references. The article's subject lacks notability and citations, at least as determined by WP:SECONDARY, WP:GNG and/or WP:NORG The South Star Hill (talk) 19:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete WP:A7 BrigadierG (talk) 19:38, 3 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. Was WP:BEFORE followed? A quick look in google books shows several sources with significant coverage, such as:


 * These were just the first two books in the list, but there are many more. I think it would be pretty easy to build an article that passes WP:NCORP with what is in google books alone, without even looking for independent sources in English and Brazilian langugage media (which would exist for a company like this).4meter4 (talk) 19:44, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * These were just the first two books in the list, but there are many more. I think it would be pretty easy to build an article that passes WP:NCORP with what is in google books alone, without even looking for independent sources in English and Brazilian langugage media (which would exist for a company like this).4meter4 (talk) 19:44, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * These were just the first two books in the list, but there are many more. I think it would be pretty easy to build an article that passes WP:NCORP with what is in google books alone, without even looking for independent sources in English and Brazilian langugage media (which would exist for a company like this).4meter4 (talk) 19:44, 3 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - struck second !vote  The content in the mentioned references do not have any encyclopedic information. The author of this article was already notified for speedy deletion  in 2019. under section A7 .  I did a Gsearch  and did not find any secondary sources as a support for this article.  The South Star Hill (talk) 20:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @ Speedy delete is no longer an option under deletion policy. Once any editor votes keep in an AFD, it is no longer eligible to be speedy deleted. Further, as the nominator you can not vote again. Double voting is strictly prohibited. 4meter4 (talk) 20:38, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Software,  and Brazil.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:29, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep The references listed above by 4meter4 meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 14:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per 4meter4 + google scholar also shows some sources w/ SIGCOV. 94rain  Talk  06:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.