Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefano Cilio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:33, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Stefano Cilio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional page about a non-notable author with two self-published books and radio DJ whose page on the Italian Wikipedia has been deleted in an AfD entry, and then repeatedly re-created to the point it had to be indefinitely protected from creation. His only achievement seems to be the creation of an unofficial music chart that he promoted on minor radio stations. I feel like the author thought he could get away with spamming the page on here after being repeatedly rejected from it.wiki.  ×°˜`°× ηαη¢у  ×°˜`°×  09:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

It’s not promotional, evidence is given. He has 100.000 followers both on Facebook and on Instagram. It’s very well known in Italy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.112.15.71 (talk) 19:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * 100k followers is known now? Leaving aside the fact that social media numbers can easily be manipulated, I have never heard of him, and the online sources aren't exactly copious.  ×°˜`°× ηαη¢у  ×°˜`°×  19:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Online sources (don’t delete them again please, this is not censorship) Pagina Facebook verificata a gennaio 2020 con SPUNTA BLU e oltre 110.000 fan (https://www.facebook.com/mezzosecolodiritornelli) Riquadro Google verificato a febbraio 2020 (https://g.co/kgs/4WE2Pt) Intervista su Radio Monte Carlo (https://www.radiomontecarlo.net/audio/1183246/STEFANO-CILIO-Autore-del-libro-.html) Intervista su RTL 102.5 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h70Us14Kc3k) Intervista su M2O Radio (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ng6EiMOmV0) Intervista su Radio Capital (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9HCYlr6bJ4) Articolo su Sette Corriere della Sera (https://www.pressreader.com/italy/corriere-della-sera-sette/20190906/283811445341208) Articolo su Rockol (https://www.rockol.it/recensioni-musicali/libri/964/stefano-cilio-mezzo-secolo-di-ritornelli) Articolo su Sentire Ascoltare (https://sentireascoltare.com/recensioni/stefano-cilio-mezzo-secolo-di-ritornelli) Utilizzo del libro su Rockol per una serie di 22 articoli (ad esempio https://www.rockol.it/news-713069/canzoni-italiane-le-piu-vendute-degli-ultimi-60-anni) Recensione su ADN Kronos (https://www.adnkronos.com/intrattenimento/spettacolo/2015/06/24/numeri-uno-mode-tormentoni-nelle-classifiche-italiane-tra_ABcCxrhE7irievgYH44fJO.html) Libro su Amazon (https://www.amazon.it/Mezzo-secolo-ritornelli-Stefano-Cilio/dp/8862316437) Libro su sito internet Arcana editore (http://www.arcanaedizioni.com/prodotto/stefano-cilio-mezzo-secolo-ritornelli-le-canzoni-piu-presenti-nelle-classifiche-italiane) Recensione su sito internet di Radiocity (https://www.radiocity.it/metti-in-valigia-mezzo-secolo-di-ritonelli) Recensione su CSI Magazine (http://www.csimagazine.it/review-stefano-cilio) Recensione su Inchiesta Sicilia (http://www.inchiestasicilia.com/tag/mezzo-secolo-di-ritornelli) Recensione su Eroica Fenice (https://www.eroicafenice.com/comunicati-stampa/mezzo-secolo-di-ritornelli-di-stefano-cilio-oltre-50-anni-di-musica) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.112.15.71 (talk) 19:56, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for spamming official social media pages and direct purchase links for the book as well as some minor publications here and there... this proves nothing. As I said, Wikipedia is not a self-promotion platform. Hence the permanent erasure from it.wiki then, and the AfD here now.  ×°˜`°× ηαη¢у  ×°˜`°×  20:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

You should be deleted instead, you only apply censorship! Shame on you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.112.15.71 (talk) 21:37, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Minor pubblications? Arcana is the number 1 music editor! Sette (Corriere della Sera) is the most read italian magazine! RTL, m2O and Radio Capital have millions of listeners... Adnkronos and Rockol are top 10 websites in Italy. Where do you live? 😂 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.112.15.71 (talk) 21:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)


 * I totally disagree with AFD, there is no self promotional material, every entry is linked and verified. He also has a verified Facebook Page, proving he's known in his country. Torsellino (talk) 15:17, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 * A blue tick doesn't mean much, considering even writing one single Buzzfeed article will get you one. What proves that he's not known (or at least, not relevant enough) is the permanent protection of the page from creation on it.wiki due to constant, persistent and insisting spamming.  ×°˜`°× ηαη¢у  ×°˜`°×  14:56, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

He has no Buzzfeed article, please check facts before talking and spamming yourself. He has been verified by Facebook for his notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.159.185.206 (talk) 18:36, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable. Not a sausage on my search for sources. --Jack Frost (talk) 11:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete little more than promotional spam. Social media verification standards are far, far lower than Wikipedia's notability standards. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep relevant radio speaker and book writer, journalist on magazines and on the net there are lots of interviews — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.159.79.8 (talk) 07:28, 19 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.