Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefano De Marchi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  11:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Stefano De Marchi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This biographical article's sources probably don't indicate notability of the subject (not do they show significant coverage), likely fails WP:GNG, and is written more like an essay; there are already draft versions including Draft:Stefano De Marchi and Draft:Prof. Stefano De Marchi. – 64andtim  ( talk ) 14:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123   (visit)  17:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 05:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Mathematics,  and Italy. –  64andtim  ( talk ) 14:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. It would be a weak keep based on his citations, but I think the existence of a special issue dedicated to him, with in-depth coverage of him, makes the case stronger. As for the existence of left-behind draft versions, I think that is an irrelevancy. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Professor De Marchi runs a research group which does a variety of important work in numerical analysis. A number of his/their papers are highly cited and influential (as one example, the Padua points). –jacobolus (t) 21:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.