Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefano de Nonveiller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Consensus is to delete Stefano de Nonveiller. Stefano Nonveiller will have to stay for now as it wasn't included at the time of nomination and hasn't been AfD tagged. Please see WP:AFD. Michig (talk) 07:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Stefano de Nonveiller

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I nominated this because I'm concerned if this person ever actually existed and my searches found nothing than mirrors and such with the best result being an obviously unusable 2012 forum. Stefano Nonveiller is also unsourced so I'm not sure if this can be improved and it has hardly been edited since March 2007. Inviting for comment. SwisterTwister  talk  05:34, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

NOTE: I haven't looked closely at all Nonveiller articles but I am adding at least one more to this nomination, Stefano Nonveiller as my searches found nothing at all. SwisterTwister  talk  17:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as hoax. Fails verifiability. Cavarrone 06:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as hoax, as per Cavarrone. I wonder if soe of the other Nonveillers in Wikipedia may be hoaxes too, e.g. Anica Nonveiller. 128.148.231.12 (talk) 13:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment -- Can we be sure this is a hoax? My search led to a google books item, but unfortunately with no available book at the end of it.  I think we need to delete as dubious and without citations.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:40, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I see three book sources, but they all are General Books LLC collections of Wikipedia articles, therefore unreliable. Cavarrone 20:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.