Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StegAlyzerAS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

StegAlyzerAS

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No decent references available with a cursory Google search only showing PR or developer written pieces. Developer doesn't have a Wikipedia article itself so don't believe the software should either. - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 13:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 14:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shawn Teller (talk) 14:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 13:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per nom. Non-notable software that does not pass WP:NPRODUCT, searching on Google gives no reliable secondary sources. Material Works  (talk) 21:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.