Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stein (journal)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:16, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Stein (journal)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions.  ~ Amkgp  💬  14:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.  ~ Amkgp  💬  14:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. In the absence of sources that would demonstrate notability for the journal itself, I would usually suggest a merge into an article on the parent organization, in this case the Norske Amatørgeologers Sammenslutning. But we have no such article and I can find no sources that would demonstrate notability for it either. It is one of six amateur Norwegian geology clubs listed at https://www.minerant.org/clubsEU.html (the other five are all much more local) but the listing is not in-depth enough to use as a source. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 00:19, 28 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.