Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stella Award


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 16:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Stella Award

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Topic is non-notable and article is a likely BLP violation. The only references provided are either primary or can't be used to establish notability (Snopes). - Burpelson AFB ✈ 14:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  --  Jujutacular  talk 15:35, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: The whole enterprise of the Stella Awards is of a dubious nature, but it is frequently covered in the press, even when it is covered as being a hoax or not a hoax or whatever it is..  E.g.,, , , , , , , ,  - the newspapers reports are endless.   Any references to individuals by name that raise BLP concerns can be removed.--Milowent • talkblp-r  21:45, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - what is the BLP problem here? Did you mean the namesake of the award?  Kuru   (talk)  00:49, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 13:39, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * We have a whole article on her case, Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, so any sourcing concerns can be met by drawing on that.--Milowent • talkblp-r 13:58, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * She appears to have passed six years ago, so the only concern would be with other living persons associated with that case. Since none of them appear to be named, I'm not sure I see the BLP angle.   Kuru   (talk)  16:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I wasn't aware she was deceased. I guess the BLP issue is a really a non-issue then. However, a Google News search for "Stella Awards" (both singular and plural) brought up zero hits for me, which is why I brought this to AfD. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 14:56, 5 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable. THF (talk) 18:54, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable. Basket of Puppies  19:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you both elaborate more on the reasoning? C T J F 8 3  chat 11:29, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Vast improvement needed, however. bd2412  T 21:06, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sources provided by Milowent establish notability. TJRC (talk) 22:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.