Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stella Kae


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Stella Kae

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Notability is lacking. Additionally, the sources employed are either non-neutral, unrelated. or non-relevant. For instance, the first and sixth sources are from the subject's workplace's website and their homepage, respectively; the 2nd source has no details about the subject other than a credit for doing the makeup in the article's pictures; the 3rd source is a dead link; the fourth source is written by the subject; and the 5th source does not even mention the subject at all. MalibuRun (talk) 20:10, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

To elaborate: In essence, this person has written a few articles here and there, is one of the thousands of people in LA who does makeup for celebrities and tv shows, and they post on the internet. This person having an IMDB page makes sense. Having a Wikipedia page would only make sense if every single person from the crew of every single tv show and magazine had a Wikipedia article. Whether the article was created by the subject or not, it seems as if it is primarily there for the purposes of marketing and not for the purposes of imparting information that other people might find useful. 20:39, 4 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MalibuRun (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 06:03, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 06:03, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 06:03, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. I found zero coverage about this person at Google News Archive, and only self-referential and social media links at Google. --MelanieN (talk) 14:37, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. The sourcing in the article is a mix of unreliable sources, a makeup credit and in the case of the MTV source, Kae isn't even mentioned at all. -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 6 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Don't see evidence of notability. Rlendog (talk) 15:51, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.