Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stemgent


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 21:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Stemgent

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No references, no significance and company is defunct and was bought by another company. Akrasia25 (talk) 00:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed with Akrasia25, no references in sections, and barely any linking to cities such as San Diego, California and Cambridge, Massachusetts. Additionally, there isn't even a talk page for the article. Severe  storm  28  00:24, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Neither lack of wikilinks to cities nor lack of an article talk page are legitimate reasons to delete an article. 00:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Leaving aside irrelevant arguments, this looks like a promotional article from the get-go. The article creator was a SPA with no other edits, who filled the article with uncited claims, and the only references (that weren't broken links) were to press releases or the company's now-defunct site.  I've found more press releases and some casual mentions online, but nothing approaching significant coverage.   Ravenswing      03:20, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: No indication of notability or SIGCOV by reliable sources. Multi7001 (talk) 04:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: as mentioned above, article is created by SPA. No indication of notability or SIGCOV from reliable sources. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. No facts are sourced to any specific source. There is a list of references with no connections to any sentences in the article, but it consists of (a) a scientific article with no clear connection to the company; (b) a press release; (c) a broken link; (d) another broken link; and (e) an article behind a paywall. That article behind a paywall would have to be really impressive to get this article past WP:NCORP. I note that the article claims, "Stemgent ranked as one of the top 25 up and coming biotech companies", without saying who published that ranking or citing it to anywhere. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per above voters and there's no assertion of notability here. Brayan ocaner (talk) 00:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete since there is zero indication of notability per the analysis of sources done by Metropolitan90. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.