Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephan Breuer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Stephan Breuer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

lack of relevant notability (own autobiography) Raps (talk) 21:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:27, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Upside: two good references in reputable publicaitons. Downsides: aboviously an autobiography, and likely to remain so. Excessive formatting and incline linking, which I trimmed. No significant presence on the web as an artist, nor in sources like books. He is on the less notable side of the the line between notable artist and self-promoter. A notable artist should return many more results and sources, news items or be included in permanent collections etc.104.163.155.95 (talk) 02:36, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:42, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom: COI editor, probably an autobiography, and not notable ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 19:56, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. One or two examples of significant coverage, but I don't see what criteria of WP:ARTIST are met. Possibly the last one, but it's hard to tell. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:38, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: lack of notability, and an autobiography as I first wrote here. And this debate was removed from the wiki page today, by the artist himself. There's almost nothing on him in the French press (and even less in the specialized press). Raps (talk) 17:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.