Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephan Cappon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 20:08, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Stephan Cappon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Joja lozzo  19:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

*Keep. Please, re-check the article as i just restored to my last revision. He won 2006 and 2007 IPA awards while 2008 IPA award won by Bill Diodato as referenced here, also he won PX3 award. - Voidz  (t·c) 20:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BIO. hasn't actually won any notable award. LibStar (talk) 02:28, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Awards won are not notable. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 17:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The PX3 award is just him on a list of over a thousand "honorable mentions". Hard to consider that a significant award. --Nat Gertler (talk) 20:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

-- Voidz  (t·c) 04:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * A third place finish in the sky subcategory of the nature pro category of the Public Choice division of the PX3 awards, with the awesome prize of getting your name in a book! And there's a mere 300 winners on that page, and another 300 on the jury prize page. --Nat Gertler (talk) 05:44, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: has been indef'd for spamming and sockpuppetry. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:38, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Just spam, not puppetry. Not that it makes a difference. - Precision Obsessed Nat Gertler (talk) 18:06, 20 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Spam article, created by what is clearly a professional promoter, who has a history of creating promotional articles on non-notable subjects, and attempting to make them appear notable by bombardment with useless "references", sometimes even with fake references that don't even mention the subjects of the articles, but mention someone completely different with a similar name. In this case, all but two of the references do no more than include Cappon's name in a list, one of them has a one sentence mention, and the full and unabridged text of the other one is "Stephan Herve Cappon: Stephan Herve Cappon has not been scheduled to exhibit yet. Add your name to our mailing list and we will send you an invitation." Not a shred of evidence anywhere to suggest that the subject comes within a hundred miles of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Spam article on non-notable individual. Lack of significant coverage in independent sources. Awards are not significant at all. Fails all notability guidelines. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 08:47, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above. Spam article.  Subject lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources.  Not notable.  --  Wikipedical (talk) 16:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.