Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie (LazyTown)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn. Canley (talk) 02:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Stephanie (LazyTown)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced article consisting of trivia about a non-notable fictional character. SummerPhD (talk) 00:48, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Not seeing how this character is "non-notable" as she is covered rather extensively on Google News as well as Google Books. In addition the previews and reviews that discuss her in an out of universe context, she is outright analyzed in a scholarly manner.  I will add some of these sources now, but clearly we have sources for analysis and development of a character who has been showcased in a titular mnanner as well.  Please reconsider this nomination.  Thank you!  Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 01:04, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Sources exist. I added a few slight ones.  If this article gets an editor who knows how to research in Icelandic, it could probably be a GA.  I've never heard of her or her show, but apparently it's a big enough deal to warrant a page. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 01:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - I say leave it alone. The Sportacus article is up and he's a main character and so is Stephanie. A Nobody and Peregrine Fisher added some great sources. Rain bow Of Light   Talk  01:25, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge to LazyTown - article is now referenced reasonably well and the removal of some excess non-notable trivia has improved it; given the show airs in over 100 countries and a dozen languages I think it classifies as notable.Vulcan&#39;s Forge (talk) 01:53, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Fancruft taken out, sources added. The nominator's concerns have been addressed and there are no issues in the rewritten form of the article.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 11:40, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The article has improved markedly since the AfD nomination, including well-referenced out-of-universe information, and trivia removed. --Canley (talk) 01:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn Article is now referenced and fancruft is gone. (BTW, no, I don't think we'll want the list of outfits back...) - SummerPhD (talk) 01:59, 20 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.