Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Brookes (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:55, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Stephanie Brookes
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not sure how this article scraped through the first AfD. There is nothing in this article which meets WP:BIO. She's a radio contributor. If all radio contributors had articles, the majority of the world would have articles. - Funky Snack  ( Talk ) 18:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment I'm not sure being on the radio is her main claim to fame. She's a successful writer who's written about spirituality, food, and travel. I believe WP:NAUTHOR (and of course WP:ANYBIO) would be the appropriate guidelines for this discussion. pburka (talk) 19:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I do not know how someone looked at the last discussion and closed it as other than delete. By the standard we have now in 2020 Brookes is clearly not notable, although she may have just barely passed notability back in 2008 when this was last discussed and when we had much less rigours notaiblity guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:33, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of passing gnG or any applicable SNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 03:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete since Pburka's comment hasn't really been addressed I did some research. There is no evidence that Brookes' books have received any of the type of coverage or recognition necessary for her to qualify under NAUTHOR and I say that as someone whose primary content area is literature. The best sign of notability I could find is the Evening Standard calling her a food expert which might be worth something if combined with other sources. But it doesn't seem like that has been and so I agree with those suggesting she is not notable. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.