Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Cholensky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:24, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Stephanie Cholensky

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable and only close, first-hand sources even try to establish notability. PROD denied. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Just clarifying that I did not "deny" the PROD. The article was PROD'ed in 2014 and the PROD was objected to, thus the article is not eligible for rePRODing. Ben · Salvidrim!   &#9993;  08:28, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:19, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:20, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:20, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:21, 13 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Not finding anything at all. The political party she co-chaired has apparently 1500 members. valereee (talk) 11:19, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being co-chair of a minor political party is not an automatic inclusion freebie under WP:NPOL — it can get a person over the bar if they can be reliably sourced to enough media coverage about them to clear WP:GNG for it, but does not guarantee an article to every chair of every political party just because their existence technically verifies on the political party's self-published website. But two of the three footnotes here are primary sources, and the one that is real media is not journalism about her being co-chair of a political party, but just a self-submitted paid inclusion engagement announcement in the classifieds of her local hometown newspaper. None of this is the kind of sourcing we require to make a person notable enough for a Wikipedia article, and I'm not finding any evidence of anything better either. Bearcat (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.