Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie DiMarco


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:46, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Stephanie DiMarco

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparently-promotional article created as part of a batch of Haas-related articles (most of which have since been PRODed or AFDed). Low-quality referencing, questionable WP:GNG notability. Basic WP:BEFORE for me turned up literally two articles actually about her,, which doesn't quite swing it for me - all other coverage is passing mentions, actually about Advent or share trading information. Perhaps there's more that clearly passes a notability guideline. David Gerard (talk) 14:16, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 14:16, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 14:16, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 14:16, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as several notes: The history and the sheer long age of this article shows it was in fact only existing for PR advertising, given the fact there were also noticeably focused accounts with this one article, none of it suggests she would in fact be independently notable (especially from the company itself and then there's nothing to suggest anything better since there's also the sheer fact this had been considered for deletion in 2007, so it shows how this was in fact needing deletion (especially now). SwisterTwister   talk  17:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable.--Milowent • hasspoken 18:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  SST  flyer  12:45, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.