Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Edgely (Valkyrie Cain)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 15:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Stephanie Edgely (Valkyrie Cain)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of Skulduggery Pleasant through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the coverage in the main articles is enough detail on the character. TTN (talk) 01:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge into List of characters in Skulduggery Pleasant. As long as that list exists, this character should be included in it - but there's no need for as much information as there is here. (If left as it is, it would violate WP:OR and WP:PLOT, as argued by the nominator.) The best approach is to cut this down to a much shorter summary, then merge into the character list. Terraxos (talk) 03:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Necessary information. She is the main character. Admittedly Plot summary has gone feral but that can be cut back.--Beligaronia (talk) 08:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Separate articles for the two main characters seems reasonable. That being said, they need to be referenced and made shipshape. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep important enough to justify keeping, though there isn't too much material to make a combination article impossible. Basically a question of style, and I see no reason to decide such things here and compel the article to be done one way or another. DGG (talk) 03:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.