Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Haim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Stephanie Haim

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I have improved the article from being an unsourced stub to now a stub with two sources. I still don't think that there is enough there to show a passing of WP:GNG especially considering the fact that Haim does not meet WP:NFOOTBALL. We have a profile page on the website of the football governing body. The same source then reports on her winning an award while playing in the local leagues. A Proquest search results in an article reporting on the same thing. This is not the level of notability required to pass GNG, in my opinion. Spiderone 22:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  22:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 10:04, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet any Wikipedia guideline. Geschichte (talk) 16:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet GNG, it is far past time we removed articles that do not meet this bare minimum requirement.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.