Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Reid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 20:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Stephanie Reid

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Probably non-notable basketball player; I can find only one significant source (just enough to avoid PRODBLP), otherwise only passing mentions of the subject, and for one game. Apparently the subject was the MVP of some minor tournament, but I am not sure if it point towards notability. Esquivalience  t 18:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:07, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:07, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment FWIW, there's also this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this. Ejgreen77 (talk) 20:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as none of this seems to satisfy WP:Notability (sports) and there's seemingly nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  22:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:48, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets WP:BASIC with coverage in The Plain Dealer, the largest-circulation newspaper in Ohio, some national coverage in Sports Illustrated, and regional significant coverage in several articles, , that is well beyond routine coverage. North America1000 11:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per Northamerica1000's reasoning and arguments. Ejgreen77 (talk) 18:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.