Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephano Guilireti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:53, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Stephano Guilireti

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently about a 16th century book publisher. Google yields nothing for either the book, the publisher, and not much about the author. No assertion of notability. i said 05:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC) - This was the publisher for the first of many books, pamphlets and poems of the Durer Rhinoceros, by far the most well known woodcut in the history of the arts. Some critics, me included consider that, without the contribution of this publisher the Giovanni Giacomo Penni “poemetto” would never been edited and the impact of the Lisbon Rhinoceros on Europe, and on the Court of Pope Leon X (the Medici pope) would not been as great. Perhaps even the interest of Dürer on drawing this beast at the time could be enhanced by these poems. This was a very important that changed the course of the art from the 16th century and until nowadays. The author of the poems and it’s publisher should be considered on the wikipedia. Besides, this information, as scarce as it may be, is the only available information to historians worldwide on the present day. - Dr. Nuno Carvalho de Sousa - Author of the brief resumé on Stephano Guilireti Ncsresearch 20:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete base on the text of the article, it seems unlikely that anything showing notability will ever be found.  Citi Cat   ♫ 05:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not enough for a stub, even. One reference in Google Books, but no preview of that material is available. There is a smidgen of notability in being a 16th century publisher, but not a whole lot. --Dhartung | Talk 12:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom Harlowraman 14:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Very Strong Keep This is precisely the kind of obscure but referenced entry that makes WP uniquely valuable. The subject's association with the Durer Rhinoceros is itself manifestly sufficient for notability (and then some). There is no doubt that this publisher existed and that he contributed to a very important cultural/historical subject, and the fact that the only description of his notability is on WP is something to be proud of. This article should not be deleted. --Greatest hits 06:26, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Notability not evident from poorly written article.--Mantanmoreland 16:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.