Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Courtney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 05:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Stephen Courtney

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Highly promotional paid-for-spam article with no claim of notability. Ninjaediator (talk) 21:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Tbh this looks G11able. It's entirely promotional. Natureium (talk) 23:13, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The nominator Ninjaediator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. However, the nomination has some merit so I will leave this debate open. MER-C 18:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as overly promotional / poorly sources / likely written by a sock. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 07:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails PROMO, cannot meet GNG. I agree that G11 could be used. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 10:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete an overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.