Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen D. Apolinsky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 10:21, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Stephen D. Apolinsky

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable lawyer. While he may have a few awards, there are no 3rd party sources. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 17:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable subject with a poorly written article. Pemberton08 (talk) 19:28, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 20:38, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 20:38, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent sources to establish notability. He was briefly quoted once in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution; heck, I'VE been in newspapers more than that. Article created by an WP:SPA. (Also a case of Melanie's Law: Any article which refers to the subject by first name is likely to have WP:COI or notability problems.) --MelanieN (talk) 21:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete There is not significant coverage in reliable, and I stress reliable, sources. --Mkativerata (talk) 04:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.