Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Daisley (journalist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Stephen Daisley (journalist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doubtful notability. Struggling to find enough independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA, since banned as part of a sockpuppet investigation. Edwardx (talk) 21:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete If the individual were notable, then coverage by multiple, reliable independent sources would exist, and the article wouldn't have to rely mainly on primary sources, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Sro23 (talk) 21:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Seems to fail on WP:GNG and is largely promotional. Shaded0 (talk) 18:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.