Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Few


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    delete as failing WP:BIO; Google News archives do not support claims of reliable sources. Also, the article talk page has turned into an attack page toward him, which we cannot tolerate. Krakatoa Katie  02:02, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Stephen Few

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable person, fails to find third-party reliable sources. ApprenticeFan talk  contribs 01:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep There's enough on google news and google books to warrant inclusion based on notability guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 15:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete entirely unsourced BLP (though it doesn't actually have any content other than noting his profession). I find no reliable sources that treat this subject in any depth that would allow for the writing of an encyclopedic biography, nor any that establish any independent notability for his technical books.Bali ultimate (talk) 17:14, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment It only has one source. I have changed the tag.-- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  06:18, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I see a lot of bylines with this chap's name in Google News (mostly the phrase "Presented by Gretchen Peterson, author of “GIS Cartography: A Guide to Effective Map Design” and guest Stephen Few.") but I find no significant coverage of the subject himself that directly address the subject in detail. There is nothing in Google books of this nature either. The subject fails the primary notability criteria for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with Bali. No establishment of notability. Books being published is not automatic notability. ThuranX (talk) 01:37, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.